Tue, 02 Sep 2008 05:58:02 GMT

Did the blogosphere kill Slashdot?


A long long time ago, in an Internet far far way, in an age before Scoble, before Digg, before blogs and RSS, before Wikipedia and yes, even before Google, there was Slashdot.

At a time where I poked around on Yahoo and CNet with lynx trying to stay up to date on the latest tech news, some kind soul pointed me at Slashdot, saying "hey, you should check this site out, they have the latest tech news and Stuff that Matters". Within a matter of weeks, I was hooked. I checked Slashdot multiple times a day and sometimes spent hours reading the comments on a particular important article or writing comments in trying to improve my Karma score. I was especially proud of my low 5 digit userid which makes me look like an old-timer now that userids are in the 7 digits!

Nowadays, I find myself reading Slashdot less and less. I rarely visit the site and it's now just one of the dozen newsfeeds in my live.com homepage and one of the 100s of feeds in my Google reader feedlist. I remember discussing the causes for this with some other longtime slashdotter a few months back and was thinking about again this today as I saw the Google Chrome article on Slashdot a full 8 hours after I read about it elsewhere. Here's my theory on why Slashdot is less relevant today than it was 4 or 8 years back...

Slashdot had three things going for it:

The latest News for Nerds and Stuff that Matters: I heard about some of the most important events in recent history - tech and otherwise - from Slashdot. About Apple's fancy new music playing thingie, about the Windows' source code leaks, Apple's switch to Intel, about Bush defeating Gore and even about 9/11.

Over time, Slashdot has become less and less instantaneous as far as news goes. The still-manual approval process, while keeping noise low and editorial quality high, means that I'm more likely to hear about something new on digg, TechCrunch or in a barrage of new articles in my RSS reader than on Slashdot. Companies have corporate blogs where they announce their PR approved messages. Fan sites exist for every technology company, tech related product and area to help you follow your favorite tech areas in your favorite RSS reader, even if it means digesting leaked product shots and watching cameraphone videos of product demos that are faked more often than not. In essence, today, we (I?) would rather be buried by 200 possibly interesting news stories rather than wait for Slashdot to publish the one true story (and a dupe the next day).

Insightful comments and influential commenters:  The comments were always my favorite part of Slashdot. The quality of comments on Slashdot was (is still?) extremely high. Contrasting the long, thought out comments following a story on Slashdot with the one-liners on digg or or anyone else's blog and drawing conclusions about their audiences from that is an exercise that some psychology or social behavior major should undertake for their thesis. To add to this, every other geek celebrity, from John Carmack (who I was a big fan of in my Quaking days) to Alan Cox, from ESR to Woz has commented on Slashdot at one time or another. I doubt many of them have Digg accounts :-)

Over time, these commenters stopped frequenting Slashdot. Most of today's geek celebrities and tech influencers have their own blogs where they publish their own raves and rants and have their own army of followers and sub-commenters who feed off of each other's passingly insightful commentary. Comments that live on a single site are apparently soo-1999 in today's world of webwide discussion. Hence, Slashdot commentary is dying a slow, uneventful death as everyone can comment everywhere and still be read and followed.

A sense of community and a wacky sense of humor: From the crazy CmdrTaco-flavored polls to being the site that spawned a thousand Internet memes, Slashdot had both a sense of community and an obscure sense of humor that has influenced me and probably thousands of other geeks.

With fewer comments and an aging audience, I suspect Slashdot's audience and sense of community has mostly vaporized. The wacky sense of humor still exists, though I hear geeks referring more to XKCD these days than Slashdot for their obscure references.

Ok, this post was way longer than I ever intended it to be. I'll blame it on the post-labor day, post-summer blues :-) The meta-point of this post is still what I started if off with - that web 2.0 killed Slashdot, the same way Web 1.0 killed BBSes and the Usenet.

-Umesh

PS:

1. I used to follow John Carmack's .plan file back in the day. His thoughts on DirectX vs OpenGL were all the rage around the DX6/7 timeframe.

2. It was a difficult choice on who to link to for the geek celebrity and tech influencer terms above. I made a last minute swap :-)

3. I know, I know this is a common debate... especially in the days when Digg was gaining in popularity, but I felt I had to write this up to get my thoughts on paper.

4. Oh yeah, I was slashdotted once. Not for something I was particularly proud of, so I didn't link to it here.


comments: 1 »

Wed, 23 Jul 2008 04:22:16 GMT

Another mid-summer update


There must be something about summer in Seattle that slows my blogging down. It's been almost 3 months since I wrote anything at all. Looking through my blog I also noticed that I my blogging frequency was low most of last summer as well culminating in a mid-summer update exactly 365 days ago :-)

Anyway, life has been busy over the past few months both at work and outside of it. Stuff I've been upto:

  • Work: Nothing major to report here, though we're getting close. The next year should be exciting, though :-)

 

  • Travel: In May, the wife & I hauled ourselves across the little pond called the Atlantic and on to Old World. I've been meaning to write up a long, detailed post about our trip (and even wrote up a few hundred words on about our first day on the flight back), but I don’t think I'll ever get to completing it. Given that, here's a quick summary of the trip, for posterity's sake.

    • First, the logistics: We spent 8 days, across the memorial day long weekend, in Europe. We flew in and spent 3 days in Rome, took a train to Venice and spent a day there and then flew to Paris to spend 4 days (5 nights) there to fly back on the 5th day.

    Rome:

    We flew into Rome on an uneventful, if cramped, American Airlines flight via New York JFK. We had a classic 'Welcome to Italy' moment as we landed and we realized that the passport control line stretched all the way to the exit gates. It turns out 5 or so international flights had landed at the time and Rome's Leonardo Da Vinci international airport was ill-equipped and understaffed to handle such a load (especially at 8am on a Sunday morning). That was probably the low point of the trip and the rest of our stay in Rome was amazing - from the ruins of the Roman forum to the Museums at the Vatican to lazy evening walks around the Piazza Navona, we had a ball in Rome and probably loved it the most of the three cities we visited on the trip.

    Venice:

    Venice is probably the most overhyped tourist location in the world. The canals and the decaying old buildings were amazing for a total of 20 minutes before we realized that we had to walk everywhere or take the slow water taxies :-) I described Venice to others as a maze filled with tourists and many agreed. We spent a night in Venice and spent the day at the Doge's Palace and St Mark's square. It was fun, but only for a day.

     

    Paris:

    Given how hectic the first part of our trip in Italy was, I wanted to take the it easy in the second part and so, we stayed in Paris for 5 nights. Chilling out, in no hurry, watching TV till 2 in the morning and getting up at noon to check out the Louvre and the Eiffel tower. Paris was beautiful, busy, expensive and classy. But I still preferred Rome.

    Versailles:

    Versailles was a day trip from Paris and we took the train there early on a Sunday morning and were back in Paris in the evening. Versailles was probably what we liked the most in France. Touring through the palace and later, though Marie Antoinette's Domaine, we were awed by the opulence and grandeur with with the French monarchs (and their groupies) lived.

     

  • More Travel: Now, if flying halfway around the world for a whirlwind tour of the Old World wasn't hectic enough, I decided to go camping in Montana during the Independence Day long weekend. D bailed on this one, so it was Ullas, me & 7 others. This trip was waay more hectic than our last trip to Montana, but it was arguably more fun inspite of the fact that I got 12 hours of sleep during the entire long weekend (or probably because of it) :-)

Photos from the trip:

  • Photography: If it wasn't obvious from the photos so far in this post, I've picked up photography in a big way over the past year. I've been reading and practicing a lot (10000+ photos in the past 12 months) and will probably write a blog post sometime on the stuff I've learned (and have yet to learn). My favorite shot so far:

Stuff I've not been upto:

  • Blogging: Self-explanatory.
  • Staying fit: I've reneged on my plan to run the Seattle marathon this year since I got only 2 or 3 days of running before laziness set in. I've also done no biking this year which makes me worried about how my legs will survive the ski season. Note to self: Fix bike up and get back on the road.
  • Gaming: (Looks at my unopened copy of GTA4). 'nuff said.

Other rambling thoughts:

  • My Roomba died (as in stopped sucking) almost a year back. It's still in my living room charging itself and running around once in a while. Must figure out what to do with it next - robotic pet project?
  • I finally solved the HD PVR conundrum by getting myself a TivoHD. The news, at 1080i, is beautiful :-) So, is Discovery HD and other channels, but somehow the local evening news looks extra sharp.


comments: 0 »

Fri, 21 Mar 2008 08:21:52 GMT

LinkedIn for Companies


In the otherwise copycat world of Social Networking, it's interesting to see LinkedIn do something new:

http://www.techcrunch.com/2008/03/20/linkedin-now-for-companies-2/

On Friday morning they will launch company profile pages that partly serve as fact sheets for about 160,000 companies and partly serve to reveal the connections that members have with them.

...bulk of the data shown on these company pages comes from LinkedIn’s own knowledge of people’s careers...

LinkedIn uses this knowledge to display recent hires, related companies, recent promotions, top locations for employees...

...you can see which companies employees usually come from and leave for, as well as which companies the current employees are most connected to...

I've always felt that the real 'moat' that social networking sites have is the data they hold about their users and the relationships. I suspect this data has been mined so far for generating more targeted advertising, but LinkedIn is the first network I've seen that's exposing this data out in a way that's interesting for end users:

As an example, here's what the Microsoft profile shows me about the average Microsoft employee:

and here's the corresponding page for Google (http://www.techcrunch.com/wp-content/linkedinbiz_shot.png):

 

 

 Now, who would have thought that the most common career path for Google employees is to join (return to?) Yahoo and Microsoft!


comments: 0 »

Read the rest of my blog...


blog
photos